Confronting Science: Expert Evidence and the Confrontation Clause
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Child Witnesses and the Confrontation Clause.
After the Supreme Court's ruling in Crawford v. Washington that a criminal defendant's right to confront the witnesses against him is violated by the admission of testimonial hearsay that has not been cross-examined, lower courts have overturned convictions in which hearsay from children was admitted after child witnesses were either unwilling or unable to testify. A review of social scientific...
متن کاملترجمه و نقد کتاب the justification of science and the rationality of religious belife
چکیده ندارد.
15 صفحه اولConfronting Science ’ s Logical Limits
To anyone infected with the idea that the human mind is unlimited in its capacity to answer questions, a tour of 20th-century mathematics must be rather disturbing. In 1931 Kurt Gödel set forth his incompleteness theorem, which established that no system of deductive inference can answer all questions about numbers. A few years later Alan M. Turing proved an equivalent assertion about computer ...
متن کاملEducation and Poverty: Confronting the Evidence
Current U.S. policy initiatives to improve the U.S. education system, including No Child Left Behind, test-based evaluation of teachers and the promotion of competition, are misguided because they either deny or set to the side a basic body of evidence documenting that students from disadvantaged households on average perform less well in school than those from more advantaged families. Because...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Supreme Court Review
سال: 2013
ISSN: 0081-9557,2158-2459
DOI: 10.1086/670021